It’s been quite a while since our last round of Guess That Medieval Beast, so I’ll just remind you that if you’d like to start at the beginning and test yourself with the earlier rounds, go to the Labels list in the sidebar and click on “game,” which is down near the bottom of the list.
And now, without further ado, our Round 9 Mystery Creature! This creature appears in a copy of Der naturen bloeme from about 1350, one of those works that is just beginning the transition from medieval bestiary to renaissance encyclopedia. To describe this thing is perfectly straightforward: it’s a fish with hands. It seems to be using its hands to reach its big, toothy mouth, but that’s about all the picture tells us, although it does have very nicely detailed gills, scales, and fins, and an attractive coloration. Go ahead and make your guess: what sort of creature is this?
Squid!
Despite the oddity of the depictions, this is another one that makes perfect sense when you think about it. In a world in which any creature living in the ocean was considered a fish, a squid is a fish with long arms, right? Sometimes the arms are reaching toward the mouth, while in other depictions they look more like they’d be used for walking; sometimes the arms have monstrous claws while in other depictions they look almost like human hands.
The only thing that puzzles me is that squid have been eaten in Europe for centuries (if not millennia) and I’d have thought that these artists would have been sufficiently familiar with calamari to know that it doesn’t look like this! But perhaps these manuscripts were not made in coastal communities, or perhaps the people copying
and illustrating the books simply didn’t make the connection between the Latin lolligo and whatever it is they called squid in their local vernacular. I do notice that even the versions written in Dutch refer to the creature as “lolligo.”
I’ve also included two illustrations of a related creature: the polipo, aka octopus. Not surprisingly, these two creatures are often depicted in very similar ways, but the octopus does have another iconographic variant in which it is shown grabbing a human. I’ve included one in which the octopus appears to be caressing the man, although I’m afraid its intentions are not so benign. It also has ears and little tiny wings (which I assume are actually supposed to be fins.) However, I particularly enjoy the final illumination in which the huge creature has reached right up into the boat to seize the sailor, and is staring him down with great intensity. (The second sailor is clinging to the handle of his oar, but it sort of looks as if he’s taking pictures on his cell phone. Finally we’ll have solid photographic evidence of the long-fabled giant man-eating octopus!)
These creatures have gotten a bad rap in mythology (blame it on Pliny), but truly they are strange and alien beasts, and I don’t think our medieval illuminators can be judged too harshly for not knowing what to make of them.
[Pictures: Lolligo, illumination from Der naturen bloeme(The Flower of Nature) by Jacob van Maerlant, c 1350 (Image from Koninklijke Bibliotheek);
Lolligo, illumination from Liber de natura rerum, 1280 (Image from BMV);
Lolligo, illumination from Der naturen bloeme, c 1300-1325 (Image from British Library);
Lolligo, illumination from Der naturen bloeme, c 1450-1500;
Polipo, illumination from Der naturen bloeme, c 1300-1325 (Images from Koninklijke Bibliotheek);
Polipo, illumination from Liber de natura rerum, 1280 (Image from BMV).]
This was funny. I only got the salamander rigth. Thank you for posting these, and thanks for covering up the textual clues as I am someone who would read through mediæval Latin or Dutch to find a verbal clue :)
This was funny. I only got the salamander rigth. Thank you for posting these, and thanks for covering up the textual clues as I am someone who would read through mediæval Latin or Dutch to find a verbal clue :)
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it. Did Round 8 reveal the correct answer for you? I realized I'd messed up the "reveal the answer" html, so I just fixed it.
ReplyDeleteYes id did, and I would not have guiessed that one in a thousand years,
ReplyDeleteSort of like a merman.
ReplyDelete